THE NY TIMES review of
THE LOST ART OF WALKING
by Geoff Nicholson
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/books/review/Max-t.html
If golf is a good walk spoiled, then walking is a great game made dull. How sluggish locomotion is, compared with the speed at which the mind absorbs new images and information. The brain strains at the body’s tether, seethes for new scenery, new stimulation, bridles at the slow feet below. Look at that tree with such lovely orange leaves, how pretty it is. . . . A minute later: the same tree, the same leaves, still good looking. Walking is adding with an abacus, it’s space travel on a donkey.
All the same, many people do it, and clearly Geoff Nicholson, the British author of “The Lost Art of Walking,” is among them. “I’ve strolled and wandered, pottered and tottered, dawdled and shuffled, mooched and sauntered and meandered,” he brags at the beginning of this pleasant tour of the literature and lore of ambulation. “I’ve certainly ambled and I could be said to have rambled. . . . I’ve also shambled, but I don’t think I’ve ever gamboled.”
It turns out that the highly prolific Nicholson also composes novels on his feet. It’s how he keeps his productivity up. He solves plot twists and problems of characterization as he walks.
…
Read the full review:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/books/review/Max-t.html
THE LOST ART OF WALKING
Geoff Nicholson
Hardcover: Riverhead Books, 2008.
Buy now: [ Doulos Christou Books $20 ] [ Amazon ]
A Review of KITCHEN LITERACY:
How We Lost Knowledge of Where Food Comes from
and Why We Need to Get It Backhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3854/is_200807/ai_n28083346
Ann Vileisis explores changes in American eating habits over more than two hundred years, and in doing so, reveals how the most basic human connection with nature-as a source of sustenance-became attenuated and indifferent, leaving consumers mentally disengaged from the world around them.
Vileisis begins her story with a return to Martha Ballard’s famous diary, reminding us that prior to the late nineteenth century, most Americans possessed intimate knowledge of the foodsheds from which their meals were drawn. To some extent, Vileisis challenges historiography that focuses on the disruptive force of agriculture, by arguing that despite its usurpations, pre-agribusiness farming provided humans with personal connections to the ecosystems in which they lived. “Yet at the same time farming changes and disrupts, it relies and rests upon nature’s rhythms” (p. 17).
Industrialization and urbanization soon lengthened the food chain and left consumers increasingly uneducated about the origins of their repasts. Factory-made foods filled daily menus, although consumers initially met them with strong resistance. The greatest strength of this book is found in those chapters that examine the five-decade campaign to elevate the supposed wisdom of government, university, and corporate experts on the nature of home economy. Vileisis highlights the inherent gender bias of this campaign which told women that the traditional kitchen knowledge inherited from their mothers and grandmothers had limited value.
…
Read the full review:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3854/is_200807/ai_n28083346
KITCHEN LITERACY
Ann Vileisis
Hardcover: Island Press, 2007.
Buy now: [ Doulos Christou Books $22 ] [ Amazon ]
THE NEW REPUBLIC reviews
Trusting Doctors: The Decline of Moral Authority in American http://www.powells.com/review/2008_11_27.html
Even the advent of a growing scientific basis for medical practice — which we can most accurately date from the middle third of the nineteenth century — has not lessened by an iota the degree to which medical authority has traditionally depended primarily on a well-recognized code of morality. As that authority has been in a state of decline for the past several decades, countless commentators have sought to identify the most significant of the congeries of reasons for which the steady downward slope continues. Has the profession sold its soul to science?
In a thought-provoking dissertation, Jonathan Imber seeks to convince his readers that, at least in America, medical morality — and, consequently, faith in doctors — can be traced to the righteous influence on the profession of Protestant and (to a somewhat lesser extent) Catholic clergy during the latter part of the nineteenth century and the first two-thirds of the twentieth century. He believes that the waning of this influence and the parallel rise of medical technology are to be indicted as having created the situation most directly leading to the loss of doctors’ authority. I would argue to the contrary: that it was always the physician’s morality, more than his technical competence, that provided the basis for his authority during the many centuries before scientific medicine began to bring the full fruits of its discoveries to ever larger numbers of patients. Moreover, that morality originated in religious principles long preceding Christianity — to a large extent, those derived from the ancient Mosaic code.
…
Read the full review:
http://www.powells.com/review/2008_11_27.html
TRUSTING DOCTORS.
Jonathan Imber.
Hardcover: Princeton UP, 2008.
Buy now: [ Amazon ]